Too Flawed to Be True

Today I published my 3rd Science article on LMLK dotcom. All 3 were originally penned for The Bible & Interpretation, but all 3 were rejected by the editor(s) for one reason or another (note that my original draft of this new one did not contain the Evolutionism epilogue).

This one rebuts a pair of articles by a pair of scholars originally written nearly a decade ago. Their publication was delayed, then my study of them was delayed, then my rebuttal was delayed. For someone who makes no money off of this, that should be what one would expect

G.M. Grena


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: